Type of site
|Founded||December 2006; 15 years ago (2006-12)|
Goodreads is an American social cataloging website and a subsidiary of Amazon that allows individuals to search its database of books, annotations, quotes, and reviews. Users can sign up and register books to generate library catalogs and reading lists. They can also create their own groups of book suggestions, surveys, polls, blogs, and discussions. The website's offices are located in San Francisco.
Goodreads was founded in December 2006 and launched in January 2007 by Otis Chandler and Elizabeth Khuri Chandler. In December 2007, the site had 650,000 members and 10,000,000 books had been added. By July 2012, the site reported 10 million members, 20 million monthly visits, and thirty employees. On March 28, 2013, Amazon announced its acquisition of Goodreads, and by July 23, 2013, Goodreads announced their user base had grown to 20 million members.
By July 2019, the site had 90 million members.
Goodreads founders Otis Chandler and Elizabeth Khuri Chandler first met while studying at Stanford (Engineering and English respectively). After university Chandler initially worked as a programmer in on-line businesses, including dating sites, and Khuri Chandler as a journalist.
Foundation and mission
Goodreads was founded in 2006. The idea came about when Otis Chandler was browsing through his friend's bookshelf. He wanted to integrate this scanning experience and to create a space where people could write reviews regarding the books that they read.
During its first year of business, the company was run without any formal funding. In December 2007, the site received funding estimated at $750,000 from angel investors. This funding lasted Goodreads until 2009, when Goodreads received two million dollars from True Ventures.
In 2011, Goodreads acquired Discovereads, a book recommendation engine that employs "machine learning algorithms to analyze which books people might like, based on books they've liked in the past and books that people with similar tastes have liked." After a user has rated 20 books on its five-star scale, the site will begin making recommendations. Otis Chandler believed this rating system would be superior to Amazon's, as Amazon's includes books a user has browsed or purchased as gifts when determining its recommendations. Later that year, Goodreads introduced an algorithm to suggest books to registered users and had over five million members. The New Yorker's Macy Halford noted that the algorithm was not perfect, as the number of books needed to create a perfect recommendation system is so large that "by the time I'd got halfway there, my reading preferences would have changed and I'd have to start over again."
As of 2012, membership was required to use but free. In October 2012, Goodreads announced it had grown to 11 million members with 395 million books cataloged and over 20,000 book clubs created by its users. A month later, in November 2012, Goodreads had surpassed 12 million members, with the member base having doubled in one year.
2013 acquisition by Amazon
In March 2013, Amazon made an agreement to acquire Goodreads in the second quarter of 2013 for an undisclosed sum. Amazon had previously purchased the competitor Shelfari in 2008, with the Goodreads purchase "stunning" the book industry. The Authors Guild called it a "truly devastating act of vertical integration" and that Amazon's "control of online bookselling approaches the insurmountable." There were mixed reactions from Goodreads users, at the time totaling 16 million members. Goodreads founder Otis Chandler said that "his management team would remain in place to guard the reviewing process" with the acquisition, with The New York Times noting that Goodreads at the time had a more reputable reviewing system than Amazon's.
Noting that some authors had been "too aggressive in their self-promotion" (as Goodreads admitted in an email) and that some readers had responded with aggression, in September 2013, Goodreads announced it would delete, without warning, reviews that threatened authors or mentioned authors' behavior. As of April 2020, the site's guidelines still state that "reviews that are predominantly about an author's behavior and not about the book will be deleted."
In January 2016, Amazon announced that it would shut down Shelfari in favor of Goodreads, effective March 16, 2016. Users were offered the ability to export data and migrate accounts.[better source needed] In April 2016, Goodreads announced that over 50 million user reviews had been posted to the website.
On the Goodreads website, users can add books to their personal bookshelves, rate and review books, see what their friends and authors are reading, participate in discussion boards and groups on a variety of topics, and get suggestions for future reading choices based on their reviews of previously read books. Once users have added friends to their profile, they will see their friends' shelves and reviews and can comment on friends' pages. Goodreads features a rating system of one to five stars, with the option of accompanying the rating with a written review. The site provides default bookshelves—read, currently-reading, to-read—and the opportunity to create customized shelves to categorize a user's books.
Goodreads users can read or listen to a preview of a book on the website using Kindle Cloud Reader and Audible. Goodreads also offers quizzes and trivia, quotations, book lists, and free giveaways. Members can receive the regular newsletter featuring new books, suggestions, author interviews, and poetry. If a user has written a work, the work can be linked on the author's profile page, which also includes an author's blog. Goodreads organizes offline opportunities as well, such as in-person book exchanges and "literary pub crawls".
The website facilitates reader interactions with authors through the interviews, giveaways, authors' blogs, and profile information. There is also a special section for authors with suggestions for promoting their works on Goodreads.com, aimed at helping them reach their target audience. By 2011, "seventeen thousand authors, including James Patterson and Margaret Atwood" used Goodreads to advertise.
Users can add each other as "Friends", enabling them to share reviews, posts, book recommendations, and messages.
Goodreads has a presence on Facebook, Pinterest, Twitter, and other social networking sites. Linking a Goodreads account with a social networking account like Facebook enables the ability to import contacts from the social networking account to Goodreads, expanding one's Goodreads "Friends" list. There are settings available, as well, to allow Goodreads to post straight to a social networking account, which informs, e.g., Facebook friends, what one is reading or how one rated a book.
Book catalog data was seeded with large imports from various closed and open data sources, including individual publishers, Ingram, Amazon (before 2012 and after 2013), WorldCat and the Library of Congress.
Goodreads librarians improve book information on the website, including editing book and author information and adding cover images. Goodreads members can apply to become volunteer librarians after they have 50 books on their profile. Goodreads librarians coordinate on the Goodreads Librarian Group.
User data becomes proprietary to Goodreads though available via an application programming interface, or API, unlike similar projects like The Open Library which publish the catalog and user edits as open data. In December 2020, Goodreads deactivated API keys more than 30 days old and said it would no longer be issuing new API keys.
Amazon requirements controversy
In January 2012, Goodreads switched from using Amazon's public Product Advertising API for book metadata (such as title, author, and number of pages) to book wholesaler Ingram. Goodreads felt Amazon's requirements for using its API were too restrictive, and the combination of Ingram, the Library of Congress, and other sources would be more flexible. Some users worried that their reading records would be lost, but Goodreads had a number of plans in place to ease the transition and ensure that no data was lost, even for titles that might be in danger of deletion because they were available only through Amazon, such as Kindle editions and self-published works on Amazon.
In May 2013, as a result of Goodreads' acquisition by Amazon, Goodreads began using Amazon's data again.
Competition and review fairness
In 2012, after a receiving a poor review on her novel, author and publisher Kiera Cass encouraged her Twitter followers to "knock [the review] off" the front page of Goodreads' section on the book. This sparked public outrage and started a discussion on the relationship between authors and reviewers on Goodreads. That same year, Goodreads received criticism from users about the availability and tone of reviews posted on the site, with some users and websites stating that certain reviewers were harassing and encouraging attacks on authors. Goodreads publicly posted its review guidelines in August 2012 to address these issues. After Amazon's acquisition of Gooddreads, this policy was modified to include deletion of any review containing "an ad hominem attack or an off-topic comment". Several news sources reported the announcement, noting Amazon's business reasons for the move:
Where authors were threatening a mass account cancellation to protest the bullying, many of the reader users who commented on the announcement are now threatening the same thing. And while much of this might seem like nothing more than petty playground behavior between children who honestly do not have a clear good guy or bad guy, keep in mind that several e-book retailers incorporate the Goodreads' API into their sales pages, effectively posting book reviews that many in the Goodreads community know to be false, and nothing more than an act of revenge against an author; real-world sales decisions have been made by consumers based on these reviews.— Mercy Pilkington, Good E-Reader News
Regarding the 2013 Amazon acquisition of Goodreads, The New York Times said that: "Goodreads was a rival to Amazon as a place for discovering books" and that this deal "consolidates Amazon's power to determine which authors get exposure for their work".
Goodreads Choice Awards
Critics of the Goodreads platform feel that Goodreads' dominant position, coupled with limited development by Amazon, has prevented better tools emerging for personalized book recommendations. Goodreads has also fallen under criticism from users who feel that the site is outdated and prone to frequent crashes and bugs, and that the recommendations are poor, frequently suggesting popular books at random rather than anything more personalized.
Authors who are aware of the site have noted problematic qualities of Goodreads affecting discoverability and search engine results, particularly the platform's inability to sort pseudonyms, and its refusal to allow authors to choose the primary author name that appears on book records. According to Goodreads, transgender authors who published under a different name before coming out can contact the website directly to request exceptions, although there are no known or notable cases where trans authors have been given such choices. Some authors have criticized Goodreads's stance on functioning like a public library rather than giving authors any control over how their information is displayed, noting that for most authors, Goodreads is the first page people see when they search on a web browser. It has also been criticized that Goodreads allows both users and authors to post quotes attributed to an author without verification of any sort; removal of such quotes is left largely in the hands of volunteer "librarians", as authors have little to no individual control over quotes posted to their own profiles. Having false or invalid quotes removed can be a difficult process; problematically the quotes can be picked up by third-party websites like Pinterest and Instagram in the meantime, spreading invalid quotes attributed to the author even further, as Goodreads quotes bring a high amount of web traffic. Goodreads often refuses to remove quotes with "likes" from an author's profile, even if the quotes are false or invalid.
Both authors and readers have noted an increase in political banter, trolling, cancel culture and cyberbullying afflicting the website. Goodreads has tried to address this, implementing rules such as only allowing reviewers to criticize a book itself, not author behaviour or political affiliations. Critics of Goodreads have considered this decision to be a form of censorship. A form of extortion scam known as "review bombing", in which trolls post numerous 1-star ratings and poor reviews on an author's new book from different sock-puppet accounts to make the book look bad (sometimes demanding money or that the author quit Goodreads usage to stop the bad reviews from coming in), has also been widely reported as a growing form of bullying on Goodreads, targeting both traditional and self-published authors. Popular fantasy novelist Rin Chupeco has noted that authors from marginalized groups are often a target, and she also criticized the minimalist approach Goodreads takes to moderation, saying, "Goodreads only removes reviews that specifically target the author, but they do not do that for every book, either — just for the authors with big enough marketing and publicity teams to demand these removals." Other victims of review bombing have pointed out that once a record for a book is created on Goodreads, even if the book has never been released to the public, is not in fact a "book" by Goodreads's definition, or will never be released to the public due to errors or delays in publishing, one-star ratings can still appear from accounts with no access to the title. Because Goodreads allows reviews for any book record as soon as it first appears on Goodreads, and cannot verify that any account-holder in fact owns the book they claim to have read, there is no clear way to police this. Some authors have suggested that Goodreads take a stricter approach to public review postings in the same manner that Amazon has done in the past, such as requiring a telephone number, a verified account by email address, and a real name before any account-holder can post public ratings or reviews.
Removal from site
In early 2021, Amazon removed all new and used copies of William Luther Pierce's white supremacist novel The Turner Diaries from sales on its platform and subsidiary platforms, citing concerns with the QAnon movement as the cause. As a result, Goodreads, an Amazon company, stripped the metadata from its record for the offending title, segregating The Turner Diaries to its "NOT A BOOK" author moniker (a category typically used to weed non-book items and plagiarized titles from the platform).
- Open Library
- The StoryGraph
- Library 2.0 the concept behind Goodreads and similar sites
- ^ Kaufman, Leslie (March 28, 2013). "Amazon to Buy Social Site Dedicated to Sharing Books". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved June 16, 2019.
- ^ "Book lovers seething over Amazon acquisition of Goodreads", Inside Bay area, April 4, 2013.
- ^ "Elizabeth Khuri Chandler Tells the Origin Story of Goodreads". Literary Hub. December 3, 2018. Retrieved April 18, 2019.
- ^ a b c d Miller, Claire Cain (March 10, 2011). "Need Advice on What to Read? Ask the Internet". The New York Times Bits. Retrieved November 29, 2012.
- ^ Good reads: book nerds social networking, TechCoastReview, archived from the original on December 19, 2007, retrieved September 17, 2007.
- ^ a b "Goodreads Raises Angel Round To Help You Find That Perfect Book". Tech Crunch. Retrieved October 22, 2012.
- ^ Lee, Ellen (July 21, 2012). "Goodreads' Otis Chandler reviews growth". SF Gate. Retrieved October 22, 2012.
- ^ Olanoff, Drew. "Amazon Acquires Social Reading Site Goodreads, Which Gives The Company A Social Advantage Over Apple". SF Gate. Retrieved October 22, 2012.
- ^ Chandler, Otis (July 23, 2013). "Goodreads Grows to 20 Million Readers". Goodreads.
- ^ "Goodreads: number of registered members 2019". Statista. Retrieved 2020-12-01.
- ^ magazine, STANFORD. "Book Buddies". stanfordmag.org.
- ^ "How A Quiet Developer Built Goodreads.com Into Book Community Of 2.6+ Million Members - with Otis Chandler".
- ^ Greiving, Tim. "Goodreads Co-Founder Builds a Literary Community". USC News.
- ^ "About Goodreads". Goodreads. Retrieved 2020-12-01.
- ^ Kaufman, Leslie (February 12, 2013). "Goodreads.com Is Growing as a Popular Book Site". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved October 11, 2016.
- ^ Kellogg, Carolyn (December 14, 2009). "What Goodreads will do with its new millions". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved August 6, 2012.
- ^ "Goodreads Launches Social Reading API". Read write Web. October 2010. Archived from the original on November 26, 2010.
- ^ a b Hopkins, Curt (March 10, 2011). "Goodreads Buys Recommendation Service Discovereads". ReadWrite.
- ^ Frassica, Matt (July 2, 2011). "For ebook devotees, reading is a whole new experience". USA Today. The Courier-Journal (Louisville). Retrieved July 28, 2011.
- ^ Halford, Macy (November 2011). "Getting Good at Goodreads". The New Yorker. Retrieved November 15, 2011.
- ^ Zukerman, Erez (March 5, 2012). "Find New Favorite Books With Goodreads". PCWorld. Retrieved August 26, 2019.
- ^ Fidelman, Mark (October 16, 2012). "These are Top 25 Book Reviewers on Goodreads". Forbes (infographic). Retrieved October 22, 2012.
- ^ Greenfield, Jeremy (November 8, 2012), "Goodreads CEO Otis Chandler on the Future of Discoverability and Social Reading", Digital Book World., archived from the original on November 14, 2012, retrieved November 15, 2012
- ^ "Amazon.com to Acquire Goodreads" (Press release). Corporate IR. Archived from the original on October 4, 2014. Retrieved March 28, 2013..
- ^ "Exciting News About Goodreads: We're Joining the Amazon Family!", Goodreads.
- ^ Kaufman, Leslie (March 28, 2013). "Amazon to Buy Social Site Dedicated to Sharing Books". The New York Times. Retrieved March 29, 2013.
- ^ Kaufman, Leslie (March 29, 2013). "Amazon to Buy Social Site Dedicated to Sharing Books". The New York Times. Retrieved August 26, 2019.
- ^ Flood, Allison (April 2, 2013). "Amazon purchase of Goodreads stuns book industry". The Guardian. Retrieved August 26, 2019.
- ^ Kaufman, Leslie (February 13, 2013). "Amazon to Buy Social Site Dedicated to Sharing Books". The New York Times. Retrieved August 26, 2019.
- ^ Petri, Alexandra (September 23, 2013). "Is Goodreads' new policy really censorship?". The Washington Post. Retrieved April 19, 2020.
- ^ "Goodreads Announces New Content Policy – Now Deletes Reviews Which Mention Author Behavior". The Digital Reader. 21 September 2013.
- ^ "Review Guidelines". Goodreads. Retrieved April 19, 2020.
- ^ "Amazon Kills Shelfari". The Reader's Room. January 12, 2016.
- ^ "Goodreads Reaches New Milestone: Fifty Million Reviews". The Digital Reader. 7 April 2016.
- ^ "Goodreads". Retrieved November 29, 2012.
- ^ "Groups". Goodreads. Retrieved November 15, 2011.
- ^ Klose, Stephanie (May 7, 2015). "Audiobook Samples Added to Goodreads". Library Journal Reviews. Archived from the original on October 12, 2016. Retrieved October 11, 2016.
- ^ Strickland, Jonathan (July 14, 2009). "How Goodreads Works". How Stuff Works. Retrieved November 29, 2012.
- ^ Kellogg, Carolyn (August 14, 2012). "Goodreads reaches 10 million users". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved November 29, 2012.
- ^ "Author Program". Goodreads. Retrieved November 29, 2012.
- ^ Ha, Anthony. "Reading Is Alive And Well At Social Reading Site Goodreads, Which Just Hit 10M Members". Tech Crunch. AOL Tech. Retrieved November 29, 2012.
- ^ "Goodreads". Twitter. Retrieved December 20, 2012.
- ^ "Goodreads". Pinterest. Retrieved December 20, 2012.
- ^ "Goodreads". Goodreads. Retrieved June 15, 2014.
- ^ Amazon's next Kindle Paperwhite outed ahead of its official launch via Amazon's own leak.
- ^ "Goodreads Librarians Group – New Ingram Import". Goodreads. Retrieved January 9, 2017.
- ^ "Goodreads Librarians Group – Adding New Books: Large Book Data Import (showing 1-50 of 472)". www.goodreads.com. Retrieved September 20, 2018.
- ^ "Amazon is going away as a data source".
At Goodreads, we make it a priority to use book information from the most reliable and open data sources
- ^ Patrick (January 9, 2012). "Goodreads Librarians Group discussion – Announcement: Goodreads to Import WorldCat & Library of Congress Data Tonight".
- ^ "What is a goodreads librarian?". www.goodreads.com. Retrieved October 11, 2016.
- ^ "Goodreads Librarians Group". Goodreads. Retrieved October 11, 2016.
By posting any User Content on the Service, you expressly grant, and you represent and warrant that you have a right to grant, to Goodreads a royalty-free, sublicensable, transferable, perpetual, irrevocable, non-exclusive, worldwide ....
- ^ "Goodreads Librarians Group – Amazon is going away as a data source (showing 1-50 of 1,601)". www.goodreads.com. Retrieved September 20, 2018.
- ^ "Goodreads plans to retire API access, disables existing API keys". December 13, 2020. Retrieved December 15, 2020.
- ^ "Goodreads shutters all APIs, breaking my open source app". December 10, 2020. Retrieved December 15, 2020.
- ^ Mek (13 Dec 2020). "Importing your Goodreads & Accessing them with Open Library's APIs". The Open Library Blog. Retrieved 16 May 2021.
- ^ Owen, Laura Hazard (January 27, 2012). "As Goodreads Ends Sourcing From Amazon, Users Fear Lost Books". Paid Content: The Economics of Digital Content. Gigaom. Archived from the original on April 19, 2012. Retrieved November 29, 2012.
- ^ Rivka (May 23, 2013). "The Announcement You've All Been Waiting For". Goodreads Librarians Group forums. goodreads.com. Retrieved July 17, 2013.
- ^ Matthews, Jolie C (July 9, 2016). "Professionals and nonprofessionals on Goodreads: Behavior standards for authors, reviewers, and readers". New Media & Society. 18 (10): 2305–2322 r. doi:10.1177/1461444815582141. S2CID 26264609.
- ^ Miller, Laura (October 23, 2013). "How Amazon and Goodreads could lose their best readers". Salon. Retrieved August 5, 2017.
- ^ Brown, Patrick (August 6, 2012). "Review Guidelines & Updated Author Guidelines". Goodreads. Retrieved September 9, 2012.
- ^ Erikson, Kara (September 20, 2013). "Important Note Regarding Reviews". Goodreads. Retrieved September 21, 2013.
- ^ Pilkington, Mercy (September 21, 2013). "Goodreads Modifies User Terms to Prevent Author Bullying, Reviewers Outraged". goodereader.com. Retrieved September 21, 2013.
- ^ Kaufman, Leslie (March 28, 2013). "Amazon to Buy Goodreads". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved October 11, 2016.
- ^ "Why Goodreads is bad for books". www.newstatesman.com. 10 September 2020.
- ^ Lashbrook, Angela (September 10, 2019). "Almost Everything About Goodreads Is Broken". Medium.
- ^ "Goodreads Help". help.goodreads.com.
- ^ "Goodreads Help". help.goodreads.com.
- ^ "Goodreads Help". help.goodreads.com.
- ^ "Goodreads Librarians Group - Issues with Quotes: Editing & Deleting My Quotes Showing 1-50 of 53". www.goodreads.com.
- ^ Owen, Laura (September 23, 2013). "Goodreads' growing pains: Attempt to curtail author bullying angers many users". gigaom.com.
- ^ McCluskey, Megan (August 9, 2021). "How Extortion Scams and Review Bombing Trolls Turned Goodreads Into Many Authors' Worst Nightmare". www.time.com.
- ^ "Amazon pulls white supremacist novel The Turner Diaries alongside QAnon purge". www.theverge.com. 12 January 2021.
- ^ "NOT A BOOK by NOT A BOOK". www.goodreads.com.
- Keegan, Victor Keegan (June 21, 2007). "It's a new online chapter for books". The Guardian.
- Méndez, Teresa (June 15, 2007). "Peer-to-peer book reviews fill a niche". The Christian Science Monitor.
- Roy, Nilanjana S. (September 27, 2007). "The world's largest reading room". Business Standard. Archived from the original on October 21, 2007. (archived)
- Sharick, Catherine (December 11, 2007). "Top 10 Websites of 2007". Time. Archived from the original on December 12, 2007.
- Official website
- Amazon Light
- Community Banana Stand
- Criticism (tax)
- History of Amazon
- List of Amazon brands
- List of Amazon products and services
- List of mergers and acquisitions by Amazon
- MacKenzie Scott
- Perfect 10, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc.
- Statistically improbable phrase
- Worker organization